英语辩论中常用的英语句子有哪些？常用话术

一辩：FIRST DEB

ATER

二辩：SECOND DEBATER

对方辩友，my fellow debaters

开始的陈词，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....后来的部分就和一般的议论问差不多了。

然后加点题外话：陈述的时候一定要自信，把握好时间胡肢旁，如果到后

来时间到，你却没陈述完的时候也要保持自信

，微笑，不管他们，把话说完，所以陈述部分的最后几句一定要背熟练。别忘了说THANK YOU。

如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进行假设：according to your logic

英语辩论的一些技巧：）~

1.主要以短小句子为主，用词不要太复杂，道理浅显尽量使对方无法驳倒。

2.语速要慢。你的目裤橡的是让所有在场的人听懂。

另外，站起来说话时要微笑，表示自信，两秒钟后再开始进行辩论饥含。要围绕辩题，不能讲得太远，要有好的心态，

不能着急。

这样效果比较好：）~~

英语辩论赛常用语精

英语辩论赛常用语（精）

如今，英语辩论赛十分热门，大家需要英语辩论赛常用语吗?以下是我搜集整理的英语辩论赛常用语，欢迎阅读，供大家参考和借鉴!

　 　英语辩论赛常用语

A征求他人观点或意见的用

语

I would be glad to hear your opinion of … 我很乐意听听你对……的意见。

Are you of the same opinion as I? 你与我的看法一致吗?

I was wondering where you stood

on the question of

… 我想知道你对……问题怎么看。

B引入自己的新观点或看法的用语

Another point i

s that … 另一点是……

Another way of looking at it is … 看这个问题的另一个看法是……

I forgot to say / tell you that… 我忘记要讲…...

C就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的'用语

That’s all I want to say. 我想说的就这些了。

Do you agree? I’m sure you agree. 你赞同吗?我相信你是赞同的。

D就对方阐述的观点塌早陆进行总结时的用语

As you said… 像你所说的那样……

But didn’t you say th

at…? 但是，难道你没说过……吗?、

If I understood you correctly, you said that… 要是我理解正确的话，你说过…….

E如何礼貌睁册地反对对方某一观点

I’m not sure re

ally.

Do you think so?

Well, it depends.

I’m not so certain.

Well, I’m not so sure about that.

I’m inclined to disagree with that.

No, I don’t think so really.

F如何强烈反对对方某一观点

I disagree.

I disagree with you entirely.

I’m afraid I don’t agree.

I’m afraid you are wrong there.

I wouldn’t accept that for one minute.

You can't really mean that.

You can’t be serious.

延伸阅读：关于英语辩论赛流程

1、正方一辩陈述本方观点(用时不超过2分钟)。

2、反方一辩陈述本方观点(用时不超过

2分钟)。

3、反方二辩向正方二、三辩手各提一个问题，采用一问一答的形式，提问前必须指明回答者(任意次序)。每次提问时间不超过30秒钟，正方二位辩手的累计回答 用时不得多于2分30秒。

4、正方二辩向反方二、三辩手各提一个问题，

采用一问一答的形式，提问前必须指明回答者(

任意次序)。每次提问时间不超过30秒钟，正方二位辩手的累计回答用时不得多

于2分30秒。

5、双方四辩可在本方二、三辩手回答问题后进行补充发言，时间不得超过1分钟。

6、反方二辩小结(用时不超过1分30秒)。

7、正方二辩团顷小结(用时不超过1分30秒)。

8、自由辩论：由双方一、二、三、四辩完成

。双方交替发言，正方先开始，各

队累计用时4分钟。

9、反方四辩总结陈词(用时不超过3分钟

)。

10、正方四辩总结陈词(用时不超过3分钟)。

11.当每位辩手陈词时间剩下15秒时，主席将提示，铃响表示发言时间已用尽，辩手须即刻停止发言。

12.评分采用10分制，评委打分到小数点后1位，计算分数到小数点后4位。

辩论赛评分标准:

1.最佳辩队

2. 最佳辩手

随着英语越来越广泛应用，用英语进行辩论的比赛也越来越普遍，懂得英语辩论赛的一些技巧，提高自身的制胜点。

英语辩论赛技巧有以下几个：

一、保持微笑

每次站起来的时候要先微笑，过两秒再进行辩论。脸上保持微笑，这样会表示自己充满自信，也可以放松自己，同时给辩论对方一种气势，造成对方一定的心理压力。

二、语速要慢

记得你这个是英语辩论赛，全程是用

英语进行的，你的对手在你说话快的程度可能会听得到明白你在说话，但大部分听众对于你说得快的情况就会不知道你在说什么，这样就是失去辩论的意

义。

三、语句要尽量简短

在英语辩论赛的时候尽量要以短小、简短的句子为主，用词要简单，道理浅显，别人一听就知道你在说的话语，而不是要想半天才明白你在说什么，如可以说you a

re bad，就尽量不要说you a

re not good。

四、要围绕主题

有些参加英语辩论赛的朋友，很多时候不知不觉在说的过程中就偏离了主题，其实这个对于英语辩论赛来

说是很分的，一定切记要围绕主题，要有好

心态，不要太心急。

五、多用反问句

在进行比赛的时候，可以多用一些反问句来增加气势，让对方觉得你准备充足，如经常用到Don't you think that。;

英语辩论赛的辩论词

Firsty,almost everybody assumes that our life cannot be happy without friendship_Absolutely,for our students_boys and girls have different views on a same thing .So it's good for our stu

dy to make fr

iends with each other_The key po

int is one c

an hardly do a job in a quick way ,otherwise,we cooperate with many people . se

condly,as an

old saying goes：“A hedge between keeps the friendship green",if we can command the limitation between heterosexual friendship ,we surely can benefit from it. As far as i am concerned,the relationship between boys and girls is beneficial for the growth of adolescents_So i stand for this point.

英语口语辩论赛有用句型

你这个题目很宽泛。有个英语辩论赛

技巧的帖子，希望能对你有用 O

n Debating Clarity:

Avoiduse of terms

which can be inte

rpreted differently by different readers_When we are talking to people who substantially agree with us we canuse such terms as "rednecks" or "liberals" and feel reasonably surethat we will be understood. But in a debate, we a万艺红将赵溶困纸re talking to peoplewho substantially disagree with us and they are likely to put adifferent interpretation on such words_Evidence

:Quoting an auth

ority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is notevidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." isnot based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Mostbiologists believe..." is not bas

ed on objective

evidence. Saying, "TheBible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be

wrongand fr

equently have been. （历届辩论赛中出现最多的问题） Emotionalism: Avoidemotionally charged words--words that are likely to produce more heatth

an light. Certainly

the racial, ethnic, or religious hate words haveno place in rational debating. Likewise, avoid argumentum ad hominem_Personal attacks on your opponent are an admission of intellectualbankruptcy. Also, slurs directe

d 须著原六话极at group

s with whom your op

ponent isidentified are usually non

productive. Try t

o keep attention centered onthe objective problem itself. There is a special problem when debatingso

cial, psychologic

al, political, or religious ideas because a person'stheories about these matters presumably have some effect on his ownlife style. In other words, rathe

r than saying "and

that's why you aresuch an undisciplined wreck" say, "a person adopting your position is,I

believe, likely to

become an undisci

plined wreck because ..."Causality: Avoid the blunder of asserting a causal relationship with the popular fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hocwhich declares that because some event A happened and immediatelyafterward event B happened that event A was the cause of event B.(Iknew someone whose car stalled on the way to work. She would get outan

d open the hood an

d slam it and then the car would start. Singing asong would have

been just as effe

ctive to allow time for a vapor lockto dissipate!) Also avoid the popular fallacy that correlation provescausation.

People who own Cadil

lacs, on average, have higher incomesthan people who don't. This does not mean that if we provide

d peoplewith Cadi

llacs that they would have higher incomes_Innuendo(影射):Innuendois saying something pejorative about your opponent without coming rightout and saying it but by making more or less veiled allusions to somecircumstance, rumor, or popular belief. If you want to see someexcellent examples of innuendo, watch Rush Limbaugh. Politicians are,unfortunately, frequently guilty of using innuendo. It is an easy wayto capitalize on popular prejudices without having to make explicitstatements which might be difficult or impossible to defend againstrational attack_Besure of your facts. What is the source of your information? If it is anewspaper or a magazine, are you sure that the information hasn't been"slanted" to agree with that publication's political bias? Wherecrucial facts are concerned, it is best

to check wi

th more than

onesource. Often international publications will give you a di

fferentperspectiv

e than your hometown newspaper. Check to s

ee whether the

bookyou are using was published by a regular publishing company or whetherit was published by some special interest group like the John BirchSociety or a religious organization. These books cannot be trusted topresent unbiased evidence since their motivation for publishing is nottruth but rather the

furtherance of so

me political or religious view_Understandyour opponents' arguments. It is good practice t

o argue with a

friendand ta

ke a position with which you do not agree. In this way you maydiscover some of the assumptions your opponents are making which willhelp you in the debate. Remember that everybody thinks that hisposition is the right one, and everybody has his reasons for thinkingso. Do not impute ridiculous or malevolent ideas to your opponent. An example of this is the rhetorical statement, "Haveyou stopped beating your wife?" This imputes or presupposes tha

t youropponent has

beaten his wife. One frequently se

es references by

conservative speakers and writers to the idea that g

ay activists want"sp

ecial privileges." This would be ridiculous if it were true. Itisn9;t true, but speak

ing as if it we

re true and well known to all isegregiously unfair to listener

s or readers wh

o may not be well

informed. It

is probably always

wise to treat your opponent with

respect, even if

he doesn't de

serve it. If he

doesn't deserve respect,t

his will probably

soon become obvious enough_Regression to the mean(逻辑退化):Another s

ource of error

which occurs very frequently is the failure totake into acco

unt regressio

n to the mean. This is a bit technical, butit is very important, especially in any kind of social or psychologicalresearch which depend

s upon statist

ical surveys or even experimentswhic

h involve stati

stical sampling. Rather than a general statement ofthe principle (which becomes more and more unintelligible as thestatement becomes more and more rigorous) an exampl

e will be used_Let

's consider intelligence testing_1_Perhaps we have a drug that is supposed to

raise the IQ o

f mentallyretarded kids. So

we give a th

ousand intelligence test

s and select the30

lowest scoring individuals.2. We then give these

low scoring kids

our drug and test them again.3. We find that there has been an increase in the average of their IQ scores.4. Is this evidence that the drug increased the IQ? Notnecessarily! Suppose we want to show that smoking marijuana lowers theIQ. Well, we take the 30 highest scoring kids in our sample and givethem THC and test them again. We find a lower average IQ_Is this evidence that marijuana lowers the IQ? Notnecessarily! Any statistician knows that if you make some kind of ameasurement of some attribute of a large sample of people and thenselect the highest and lowest scoring individuals and make the samemeasurement again, the high scoring group will have a lower averagescore and the low scoring group will have a higher average score thanthey did the first time. This is called "regression to the mean" and itis a perfectly

universal sta

tistical principle_Thereare und

oubtedly more

points to be made here_Suggestions will begratefully received. Larry has made the following suggestions: · Apply the scientific method. （运用科学方法） · Cite relevant personal experience. （合理引用相关的个人经历） · Be polite. （辩论过程中有礼待人） · Organize your response. (Beginning, middle, end.) （对你辩词进行合理的组织） · Treat people as individuals.· Cite sources for statistics and studies used. · Literacy works. Break posts into sent

ences and par

agraphs. · Read the p

ost you are respondi

ng to_Stay open to learning

小学英语辩论赛万能句型？

1.

how to agree strongly with an opinion 我完全同意你的观点!

2.

i couldnt agree more

!我完全同意!

3.

thats absolut

ely true! 绝对是真的!

4.

absolutely! 当然!

5.

i take your point. 我接受你的意见,

英语辩论急求几个句子！

As we know foreigh countries is

really devel

oped well than our country_Like their Education,Environment,Government,Travel.正如我们所知，国外确实比我们国内发展的要

好很多，像他们在教育，环

境保护，政府政策，还是旅游业。

英语辩论赛开头万能句子？

allow me to point out, but, your argument is fatally flaw, in the first place, for starters, first and foremost, your bone of contention is totally diverging from the

topic。